Introduction In my tweets, I have already said that the article 370 abrogation judgment was a farce. The judgment has been delivered with explicit bias towards nationalism. Certain presumptions like, “Kashmir is an integral part of India irrespective article 370”, “the objective of Art 370 was national integration, not disintegration”, etc, were made, and then reasons were filled in to achieve the desired results. As an #Anti-NationalHumanist, I am against…

In my tweets, I have already said chicanery has been practiced while writing the Ayodhya Ram Mandir judgment. Imputing such motives to the Supreme Court of India (SCI) judges is a very strong attitude; therefore, it would be better if my opinion is elaborated below for the purpose of record if nothing else, even though now the topic is stale. Ayodhya Ram Mandir Judgment, a Property Dispute It is actually…

My only objective of this AADHAAR judgment analysis is to consolidate arguments on the question of punishment in case of any contempt of court proceedings and to highlight errors apparent on the face of record in the AADHAAR judgment. I am only analysing the majority judgment by Sikri J. I have committed multiple contempt of court in my tweets dated 26.09.2018 at the following address: https://x.com/Ankur_Mutreja/status/1044931638881341440?s=20. Interested persons can read…

Judge Loya judgment has been rendered on a group of petitions seeking investigation into the Judge Loya death. The only issue in the Judge Loya case was whether the inquest report prepared u/s 174 CrPC closing the case on the finding that the Judge Loya death was due to natural causes, was correct. Judge Loya Judgment: Unnecessary References Let me first do away with the unnecessary references in the Judge…

Triple Talaq Judgment: the Facts with Respect to Interpretation • The practice of Triple Talaq is part of statutory law, not personal law, vide Nariman J and Lalit J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is part of personal law, not statutory law, vide CJI, Nazeer J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is part of neither personal law nor statutory law, vide Kurien J. • The practice of Triple…

AADHAAR PAN Judgment: Facts Supreme Court of India has recently delivered the AADHAAR PAN judgment on the validity of S. 139AA of Income Tax Act.  S. 139AA makes the following mandatory: Quoting of AADHAAR for filing income tax returns post July 1, 2017. Quoting of AADHAAR in any new application for allocation of PAN post July 1, 2017. AADHAAR-PAN linking post date to be announced by the central government. Furthermore,…

Misintrepretation of the Law of Sedition The only relevant portion in Kanhaiya Kumar bail order is paras 54 to 57. The order has completely misintrepreted the law of sedition. Even though Section 124A of IPC has been quoted, it has not been followed. There is no connection between anti-nationalism and disaffection against the government. What is punishable under the section is the preparatory actions of waging war against the state…