Introduction The common perception was that Modi conspired to orchestrate Gujarat riots post the Godhra incident. On 27.02.2002, Kar-sevaks were allegedly attacked and the coaches of the train carrying them were set on fire at Godhra Railway Station, Gujarat. This incident led to the death of 58 kar-sevaks on the spot and one later. Widespread riots followed this incident in Gujarat targeting Muslims. However, the above perception was single-handedly changed…

Introduction In my tweets, I have already said that article 370 abrogation judgment was a farce. The judgment has been delivered with explicit bias towards nationalism. Certain presumptions like, “Kashmir is an integral part of India irrespective article 370”, “the objective of Art 370 was national integration, not disintegration”, etc, were made, and then reasons were filled in to achieve the desired results. As an #Anti-NationalHumanist, I am against any…

In my tweets, I have already said chicanery has been practiced while writing the Ram Mandir judgment. Imputing such motives to SC judges is a very strong attitude; therefore, it would be better if my opinion is elaborated below for the purpose of record if nothing else, even though now the topic is stale. Ram Mandir Judgment, a Property Dispute It is actually wrong to call it Ram Mandir judgment….

My only objective of this AADHAAR judgment analysis is to consolidate arguments on the question of punishment in case of any contempt of court proceedings and to highlight errors apparent on the face of record in the judgment. I am only analysing the majority judgment by Sikri J. I have committed multiple contempt of court in my tweets dated 26.09.2018 at the following address: https://mobile.twitter.com/i/status/1044931638881341440. Interested persons can read them….

Judge Loya judgment has been rendered on a group of petitions seeking investigation into the death of Judge Loya. The only issue in the case was whether the inquest report prepared u/s 174 CrPC closing the case on the finding that the death was due to natural causes, was correct. Judge Loya Judgment: Unnecessary References Let me first do away with the unnecessary references in the judgment. Caravan Articles There…

Triple Talaq Judgment: The Facts • The practice of Triple Talaq is not part of personal law but statutory law vide Nariman J and Lalit J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is part of personal law not statutory law vide CJI, Nazeer J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is neither part of personal law nor statutory law vide Kurien J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is violative…

AADHAAR-PAN Judgment: Facts Supreme Court of India has recently delivered the AADHAAR-PAN judgment on the validity of S. 139AA of the Income Tax Act.  S. 139AA makes the following mandatory: Quoting of AADHAAR for filing income tax returns post July 1, 2017. Quoting of AADHAAR in any new application for allocation of PAN post July 1, 2017. Linking of AADHAAR with PAN post date to be announced by the central…

Misintrepretation of the Law of Sedition The only relevant portion in Kanhaiya Kumar’s bail order is paras 54 to 57. This order has completely misintrepreted the law of sedition. Even though S. 124A has been quoted, it has not been followed. There is no connection between anti-nationalism and disaffection against the government. What is punishable under the section is the preparatory actions of waging war against the state by bringing…

Kedarnath Judgment: Procedural Lapses There were four appeals before the supreme court wrt Kedarnath judgment on sedition. C.A. 169 of 1957, which arose from the grant of special leave to appeal was dismissed. And the three other appeals, i.e. C.A. 124-126 of 1958, which arose from the certificate granted by the high courts, were allowed and the cases were remanded back to the high courts. The challenge to s. 124A,…