Legal Luminaries Visit this Corner for Coffee Table Discussion!

Strictly Legal

Triple Talaq Judgement Intrepretation

Triple Talaq Judgement Intrepretation: Bullet Points

Intrepretation • The practice of Triple Talaq is not part of personal law but statutory law vide Nariman J and Lalit J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is part of personal law not statutory law vide CJI, Nazeer J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is neither part of personal law nor statutory law vide Kurien J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is violative of Article 14 of…

Read More

AADHAAR-PAN Judgement by The Supreme Court of India

The Analysis of AADHAAR-PAN Judgement by the Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court of India has recently delivered the AADHAAR-PAN judgement on the validity of S. 139AA of the Income Tax Act, vide which the quoting of AADHAAR no. for filing Income Tax returns post July 1, 2017; quoting of AADHAAR no. in any new application for allocation of PAN post July 1, 2017; and linking of AADHAAR no. with PAN no. post date to be announced by the Central…


Kulbhushan Jadhav Case

Kulbhushan Jadhav Case: Basics

This linked article, https://thewire.in/136848/pak-india-kulbhushan-jadhav-icj/, has very comprehensively stated the facts of and arguments taken in Kulbhushan Jadhav case pending before the ICJ. Further, the author has put up his own arguments in the article. However, it is written by an Indian, so it has its biases. Nevertheless, I would recommend you to read it. In the present article, I am stating my understanding of the basics of the case and…


No Picture

Kanhaiya’s Bail Order Is Inconsequential!

The only relevant portion in Justice Pratibha Rani’s order on Kanhaiya’s bail plea is paras 54 to 57. I think this order has completely misunderstood the law of sedition. Even though S. 124A has been quoted, it has not been followed. There is no connection between anti nationalism and disaffection against the government. What is punishable under the section is the preparatory actions of waging war against the State by…


No Picture

Kedarnath Judgment on Sedition Needs a Review

It will be noticed that the constitutionality of the provisions of the sections under which the appellant was convicted had not been convassed before the High Court. But in the petition for special leave, to this Court, the ground was taken that ss. 124A and 505 of the Indian Penal Code ‘are inconsistent with Art. 19(1) (a) of the Constitution. It has not been contended before us on behalf of…


No Picture

National Herald Case

Well…I generally don’t comment on politicking between political parties, but since this judgment has opened up new arenas of accountability of political parties, I am commenting on it. The judge has made three very strong exceptions in the case of a political party. First, he has held that in case of a political party, the rule of locus standi needs to be eased, for public interest is involved. Secondly, he…


No Picture

Legal Aspects WRT to AAP Government Resignation

The AAP government has resigned because they couldn’t introduce the Jan Lokpal Bill in the assembly. The hurdle was the message sent by the Lt. Governor to the assembly u/s 9 of the GNCTD Act, 1991. In his message, the LG clearly stated that the bill was not sent to him for his prior consent as required u/s 22 of the GNCTD Act, 1991, for the bill was in the…