Strictly Legal

No Picture

How Judiciary and SIT helped Modi

The common perception was that Modi & Co. orchestrated Gujarat genocide following Godhra incident, wherein kar-sevaks travelling in Sabarmati Express were allegedly attacked and coaches of the train were set on fire at Godhra Railway Station in Gujarat 0n 27.02.2002, leading to the death of 58 kar-sevaks on the spot and one later. However, the perception was single-handedly changed by Indian judiciary, so much so that Modi is enjoying his…

Read More

No Picture

Article 370 — Alternative Judgment

In my tweets, I have already said that Art 370 judgment was a farce. The judgment has been delivered with explicit bias towards nationalism. Certain presumptions like, “Kashmir is an integral part of India irrespective Art 370”, “the objective of Art 370 was national integration, not disintegration”, etc, were made, and then reasons were filled in to achieve the desired results. As an Anti-National Humanist, I am against any bias…


AADHAAR judgment analysis

AADHAAR Judgment Analysis

My only objective of this AADHAAR judgment analysis is to consolidate arguments on the question of punishment in case of any contempt of court proceedings and to highlight errors apparent on the face of record in the judgment. I am only analysing the majority judgment by Sikri J. I have committed multiple contempt of court in my tweets dated 26.09.2018 at the following address: https://mobile.twitter.com/i/status/1044931638881341440. Interested persons can read them….


Judge Loya Judgment

Judge Loya Judgment Analysis

Judge Loya judgment has been rendered on a group of petitions seeking investigation into the death of Judge Loya. The only issue in the case was whether the inquest report prepared u/s 174 CrPC closing the case on the finding that the death was due to natural causes, was correct. Let me state at the outset that out of 118 pages of the judgment, 117 pages are pure noise. There…


Triple Talaq Judgement Intrepretation

Triple Talaq Judgement Intrepretation: Bullet Points

Intrepretation • The practice of Triple Talaq is not part of personal law but statutory law vide Nariman J and Lalit J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is part of personal law not statutory law vide CJI, Nazeer J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is neither part of personal law nor statutory law vide Kurien J. • The practice of Triple Talaq is violative of Article 14 of…


AADHAAR-PAN Judgement by The Supreme Court of India

The Analysis of AADHAAR-PAN Judgement by the Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court of India has recently delivered the AADHAAR-PAN judgement on the validity of S. 139AA of the Income Tax Act, vide which the quoting of AADHAAR no. for filing Income Tax returns post July 1, 2017; quoting of AADHAAR no. in any new application for allocation of PAN post July 1, 2017; and linking of AADHAAR no. with PAN no. post date to be announced by the Central…


Kulbhushan Jadhav Case

Kulbhushan Jadhav Case: Basics

This linked article, https://thewire.in/136848/pak-india-kulbhushan-jadhav-icj/, has very comprehensively stated the facts of and arguments taken in Kulbhushan Jadhav case pending before the ICJ. Further, the author has put up his own arguments in the article. However, it is written by an Indian, so it has its biases. Nevertheless, I would recommend you to read it. In the present article, I am stating my understanding of the basics of the case and…